When checking out the engagement news in the local paper, most follow the same format:
…Bride & groom’s parents’ names announcing the engagement
…names of the couple
…bride-to-be’s educational/employment background
…groom-to-be’s educational/employment background
…date/location of ceremony
For the sake of economy, some look like this:
…Bride & groom’s parents’ names announcing the engagement
…names of the couple
…date/location of ceremony
In today’s paper, the announcement looked like this:
…Bride & groom’s parents’ names announcing the engagement
…names of the couple
…bride-to-be’s educational/employment background
…LENGTHY description of parent’s occupations
…groom-to-be’s educational/employment background
…LENGTHY description of parent’s occupations
…date/location of ceremony
Both fathers are high-power attorneys.
I realize that the wealthy/powerful use family weddings as social payback but it seems really tacky to insert their employment into an engagement announcement.
Yes, they’re probably going to pay beau coup bucks but doesn’t this just seem like an advertising gimmick?
I wonder if they can write the announcement cost off?
I’m still working on Emily Post guidelines from the 50s & 5 60s and I know etiquette has changed since then but it just doesn’t seem right.
What’s your idea?
Is this tacky or currently acceptable?